Keyboard instruments > Piano solo
Muzio Clementi
Six Piano Sonatinas op. 36
Editor: Ernst-Günter Heinemann
14.00 €
Urtext Edition, paperbound
Pages: 55 (VII, 48), Size 23,5 x 31,0 cm
Order no. HN 848 · ISMN M-2018-0848-2
Towards the end of the 18th century, Clementi increasingly advocated the piano as the successor to the harpsichord. He composed expressly for the new instrument and in 1801 published a piano school. His interest in teaching is also shown by the “Six progressive Sonatinas” op. 36 – six sonatinas in ascending order of diffi culty, which are still extremely popular with today's piano teachers. Our Urtext edition follows the long established practice of using the musical text of the first edition from 1797. Clementi’s original fingering, which is surprisingly modern, has been included throughout the work.
Reviews
Many teachers consider Henle Verlag publications the "gold standard" of Urtext editions, particularly for advanced repertoire. Henle has recently published an Urtext edition of Clementi's Op. 36 Sonatinas, some of the most treasured works in the intermediate piano literature. This edition has the features teachers expect from Henle, especially reliance on original manuscripts and quality engraving on thick paper. ... Teachers who regularly teach these sonatinas should consider investing in the Henle edition – if not for students, then at least as a valuable reference for their own libraries.
[American Music Teacher, 2012]
De nieuwe uitgave van Henle biedt twee bijzonderheden: Clementi's eigen inventieve, speciaal op beginners gerichte vingerzetting en (als voorbeeld) een latere versie van de eerste sonatine.
[Piano Wereld, 2011]
Naast de prettig leesbare druk, die we van deze uitgever gewend zijn, is er een drietal zaken waardoor de uitgave de moeite waard is. Allereerst valt het gedegen voorwoord op ... Op sommige plaatsen zijn ze verrassend anders dan wat we in de meeste sonatinealbums aangereikt krijgen.
[Piano Bulletin, 2011]
Contents
-
Piano Sonatina C major op. 36,1
Level of difficulty (Piano): easy (Level 2/3)Other titles with this level of difficulty » -
Piano Sonatina G major op. 36,2
Level of difficulty (Piano): easy (Level 2/3)Other titles with this level of difficulty » -
Piano Sonatina C major op. 36,3
Level of difficulty (Piano): easy (Level 3)Other titles with this level of difficulty » -
Piano Sonatina F major op. 36,4
Level of difficulty (Piano): medium (Level 3/4)Other titles with this level of difficulty » -
Piano Sonatina G major op. 36,5
Level of difficulty (Piano): medium (Level 3/4)Other titles with this level of difficulty » -
Piano Sonatina D major op. 36,6
Level of difficulty (Piano): medium (Level 3/4)Other titles with this level of difficulty » -
Piano Sonatina - revised version C major op. 36,(1)
Level of difficulty (Piano): easy (Level 2/3)Other titles with this level of difficulty »
The levels of difficulty of the
piano music published by G. Henle Publishers
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| easy | medium | difficult | ||||||
The levels of difficulty of the piano music published by G. Henle Publishers
| Level | Grade | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | easy | Bach, Notebook for Anna Magdalena Bach, nos. 4 and 5 |
| 2 | Bach, Well-Tempered Clavier I, no. 1 Prelude C major | |
| 3 | Beethoven, Piano Sonatas op. 49,1 and 2 | |
| 4 | medium | Grieg, Lyric Pieces op. 12, no. 4 |
| 5 | Schumann, Fantasy Pieces op. 12, no. 1 | |
| 6 | Chopin, Nocturnes op. 27, nos. 1 and 2 | |
| 7 | difficulty | Beethoven, Piano Sonata op. 10, no. 3 |
| 8 | Beethoven, Piano Sonata op. 81a | |
| 9 | Schumann, Toccata op. 7 |
Guide to the levels of difficulty
"I don't know what 'difficult' means. Either you can play or you can't" – this was the rather terse comment by the great violinist Nathan Milstein, on being asked about the unbelievable difficulty of Niccolo Paganini's Caprice no. 1.
The relativity of the evaluation of difficulty in music immediately becomes clear. Yet I gladly take up this great challenge, presented to me by G. Henle Publishers. For I am aware of how useful a guide like this can be, both from my own experience as well as that of many colleagues. In particular so as to be able to identify "appropriate" works. For example for music teachers, who teach at very different levels, from beginners to those preparing for music conservatories, but also for all those interested amateurs for whom this guide is intended.
After careful deliberation I have settled on nine levels of difficulty, which I have divided into three groups: 1–3 (easy), 4–6 (medium), 7–9 (difficult). A number of parameters have been considered when assessing the level of difficulty. I have not just looked at the number of fast or slow notes to be played, or the chord sequences; of central importance are also the complexity of the piece's composition, its rhythmic complexities, the difficulty of reading the text for the first time, and last but not least, how easy or difficult it is to understand its musical structure. I have defined "piece" as being the musical unit of a sonata, or a single piece in a cycle, which is why Bach's "Well-Tempered Clavier" Part I comprises a total of 48 levels of difficulty (each prelude and fugue is considered separately), Schumann's Sonata in f sharp minor op.11 only has a single number. My assessment is measured by the ability to prepare a piece for performance.
While assessing the pieces, it became clear that the medium level of difficulty (4–6) is the trickiest. Now and again this means that a piece is judged as a "3/4", even if it only deserved a "3" as far as piano technique is concerned. An example of such a "borderline" case (easy/medium) is Schumann's "Scenes from Childhood" op. 15 Von fremden Ländern und Menschen or at the other end "6/7" part of Bach's "English Suites". And of course within a main category there are also "from-to" evaluations (e.g. 7/8).
Any evaluation of art or music will always be subjective, even if the aim was to be objective. Despite the fact that I have endeavoured to be as careful as possible, I am all too aware that the results of my work can be called into question, and am therefore grateful for any suggestions you might have.
Prof. Rolf Koenen © 2010

